In a collection of games, often the 1st game sets the tone. If it is a collection of a players best games, the choice of the first game normally shows some kind of breakthrough, or indication that a new chess talent is born. In P.H. Clarkes book on Petrosian "Best Games of Chess 1946-1963", the first game fits this bill, although it is somewhat atypical of how Petrosian would play in later years. A quick tactical win, after his opponent created too many weaknesses on the queen side.
URS-ch U18 Leningrad, 1946
1 comment:
Petrosian *was* considered an excellent tactician. Could that also have been the foundation for his defensive skills? Whatever the reason, the '1st game' idea is excellent. - Mark
Post a Comment