In a collection of games, often the 1st game sets the tone. If it is a collection of a players best games, the choice of the first game normally shows some kind of breakthrough, or indication that a new chess talent is born. In P.H. Clarkes book on Petrosian "Best Games of Chess 1946-1963", the first game fits this bill, although it is somewhat atypical of how Petrosian would play in later years. A quick tactical win, after his opponent created too many weaknesses on the queen side.
URS-ch U18 Leningrad, 1946
1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. c4 d5 4. Nbd2 c5 5. e3 Nc6 6. a3 Bd6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. b4 Be7 9. Bb2 O-O 10. Bd3 dxc4 11. Nxc4 a6 12. Qc2 h6 13. O-O b5 14. Bxf6 Bxf6 15. Rad1 Bd7 16. Bh7+ Kh8 17. Be4 Nxb4 18. axb4 Rc8 19. Rxd7 Qxd7 20. Nb6 1-0
1 comment:
Petrosian *was* considered an excellent tactician. Could that also have been the foundation for his defensive skills? Whatever the reason, the '1st game' idea is excellent. - Mark
Post a Comment