tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4459360717297142573.post5249982492452751604..comments2024-03-29T18:31:49.454+11:00Comments on chessexpress: The dilemma of coachingShaun Presshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00897215011002594039noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4459360717297142573.post-10147405375349985682011-04-11T17:42:06.981+10:002011-04-11T17:42:06.981+10:00This is very essential question and I am glad you ...This is very essential question and I am glad you are poundering over it. I guess the difficulty to find answer is in that there isn't single answer or maybe question needs to be rephrased.<br /><br />One thing is that so many different thigs drive at chess seduces us to it. I still remember receiving Kasparovs My greatest predecessors on Petrosian from mail and feeling this is greatest thing in whole universe. Earlier Duncan Suttles highly flexible original take made me laugh out loud while studying his games. I mean. I guess the thing is to find things that drive those players and that the other things come along. Basicly I am of school that endgame should be studied first and that the understanding of endgames gives meaning to opening play and middlegame play. Instead of stumbing in the darkness or deciding between alternatives which true meaning you really don't know you actually know the reasons you go for certain pawn structure or allow certain exchange.Laurihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07042717033720504837noreply@blogger.com