tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4459360717297142573.post8755876720692635466..comments2024-03-27T20:44:56.139+11:00Comments on chessexpress: Grumpy old manShaun Presshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00897215011002594039noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4459360717297142573.post-4924188719560599662022-09-24T20:46:34.004+10:002022-09-24T20:46:34.004+10:00" appreciate more and more the printed word, ..." appreciate more and more the printed word, in so much as there is a degree of quality control before publication. "<br /><br />Yes I agree. But this is visible exactly because the digital approach as taken over and publishers have adapted to the "faster, less accurate, delivery". Only then one can see the difference. And that is pervasive in every field.<br /><br />I think that the initial digital works were fine, as there was still a strong comparison to paper based news, now it is different.<br /><br />Still quality is out there, only it is more difficult to find among, as you say, increasing amounts of lower shared quality. This lower shared quality was there also before, but it was not as cheap to share it, and therefore it was not distributed.PAnoreply@blogger.com