tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4459360717297142573.post2935803997632332352..comments2024-03-29T18:31:49.454+11:00Comments on chessexpress: Still not getting it rightShaun Presshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00897215011002594039noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4459360717297142573.post-27089585892740875212018-04-16T23:09:02.881+10:002018-04-16T23:09:02.881+10:00Based on a brief read, the petition seems to be (a...Based on a brief read, the petition seems to be (a) about the length of the sentence and (b) a worry that this sends the wrong message about reporting cheating. I can understand the issue about the length of the sentence (although 9 months was suspended) but I suspect they misunderstood the reason for the ruling when arguing point b.Shaun Presshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00897215011002594039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4459360717297142573.post-6244539584823089542018-04-16T07:15:33.492+10:002018-04-16T07:15:33.492+10:00Dear Shaun,
What are your thots on the petition o...Dear Shaun,<br /><br />What are your thots on the petition of support by a sizeable number of GMs against the sanction? I do not access FB, hence have not read the explanations proffered, eg by Aagaard. I think yours is a good explanation that GM S overstepped the mark. But now to have GMs arguing against the ban without acknowledging the "harm" done against a 14 yo, that is just "not cricket"!siow, weng nianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11482127422493396422noreply@blogger.com