tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4459360717297142573.post1835497926257964257..comments2024-03-27T20:44:56.139+11:00Comments on chessexpress: Computers aren't accurateShaun Presshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00897215011002594039noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4459360717297142573.post-69717138186747694712009-02-16T09:58:00.000+11:002009-02-16T09:58:00.000+11:00Ahh, there is more subtlety to this study than I i...Ahh, there is more subtlety to this study than I imagined. Maybe computers know more than I give them credit for!Shaun Presshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00897215011002594039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4459360717297142573.post-49675733159325825392009-02-15T03:10:00.000+11:002009-02-15T03:10:00.000+11:00Re 'hanging on to the f pawn doesn't look necessar...Re 'hanging on to the f pawn doesn't look necessary', White needs to keep the f-Pawn. If you lose the f-Pawn and head for a1, as you suggest, Black creates zugzwang with Qc2, forcing the Bishop to move. Then Black wins the Bishop with a fork. <BR/><BR/>Without the f-Pawn, Black can force the King into the corner, winning as I just described. The problem then becomes: can Black win the f-Pawn by force? It looks possible. - MarkMark Weekshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10101044127493771263noreply@blogger.com