A little gem turned up on my doorstep the other day. "Samuel Lipschutz. A Life in Chess" by Stephen Davies, chronicles the chess career of Samuel Lipschutz, one of leading American players of the late 19th Century. But as it has just arrived (and I have only just started to read it), a full review will wait for another day.
Instead I simply mention an interesting story that occurs early in the book. Lipschutz lived in New York, and one of the great attractions of the time was "Ajeeb" the Chess playing automaton. It was hosted at the Musee Eden, and it cost 50c to enter the Eden, 10c to see the Automaton, and a further 10c to play against Ajeeb. While it was billed as a chess machine, from contemporary reports it was clear that most people assumed that there was a person hidden inside. While this did not diminish the popularity of the attraction, it did allow for a little skulduggery on the part of one of its opponents.
A player (not Lipschutz in this case), described in the book as "a man, ... , who everybody beats at his chess club" managed to defeat Ajeeb, when so many stronger players could not. His simple strategy was to light up a cigar ("fearfully bad") and blow as much smoke into Ajeeb as he could. Clearly this had a debilitating effect on the operator, who was trapped inside, whose play, and health got worse with every puff.
As for Lipschutz, he did play Ajeeb on at least twice, winning both the games that records exist of.
Friday, 31 July 2015
Wednesday, 29 July 2015
2015 Politiken Cup
Oddly enough, one of the reasons why last years numbers were down at the ANU Open (as opposed to this years good turnout) was due to a tournament on the other side of the world. The 2014 Politiken Cup in Denmark was scheduled to run just before the start of the Chess Olympiad, and so a number of strong Australian players used it (instead of the ANU Open) as a warm up.
This years event did not have the benefit of serving as a lead in for the Chess Olympiad, but it seems not have troubled the event, which has attracted a record field. Having a quick look at the tournament home page I can see why it is such a success, as apart from the main event, there are lectures and simuls for players to take part in. The line up of lecturers is quite impressive, with Timman, Sune Berg Hansen and Agaard amongst the talent. There is even a lecture from Chessbase about how to use Chessbase effectively, which I am sure will be very popular.
As for the hordes of Australian's playing, this year it is down to 1. IM Justin Tan (who is based in Europe) is taking part, and after a 3/3 start has slowed down a little to sit on 3.5/5. With such a large field (431 players) 5 rounds is still not enough to separate the leaders and their are still 4 players with 5/5. The tournament is showing around 60 games live, and with online commentary, it may just be the distraction I need from what is turning out to be a catastrophic start for Australian in the cricket!
This years event did not have the benefit of serving as a lead in for the Chess Olympiad, but it seems not have troubled the event, which has attracted a record field. Having a quick look at the tournament home page I can see why it is such a success, as apart from the main event, there are lectures and simuls for players to take part in. The line up of lecturers is quite impressive, with Timman, Sune Berg Hansen and Agaard amongst the talent. There is even a lecture from Chessbase about how to use Chessbase effectively, which I am sure will be very popular.
As for the hordes of Australian's playing, this year it is down to 1. IM Justin Tan (who is based in Europe) is taking part, and after a 3/3 start has slowed down a little to sit on 3.5/5. With such a large field (431 players) 5 rounds is still not enough to separate the leaders and their are still 4 players with 5/5. The tournament is showing around 60 games live, and with online commentary, it may just be the distraction I need from what is turning out to be a catastrophic start for Australian in the cricket!
The ups and downs of turn based chess
Apart from my ICCF based chess, I also play some turned based chess on chess.com This differs from usual CC in that each move has a fixed time limit (usually 3 to 5 days per move). So you cannot build up time by moving quickly, as the clock simply restarts with every move.
To be honest I don't mind this format, as it means I have to look at my game on a regular basis. On the ICCF server I often fall into the trap of briefly looking at a game, then coming back to it over a week, before realising I have to play 5 moves in 2 days. On the other hand it seems a little easier for me to play a 'casual' move in the turn based format, as the following game demonstrates.
At various points I thought I had found a winning line, only to realise it didn't quite work. And when I did find a winning line I immediately undid my good work by castling, allowing my opponent to recover some material. Fortunately I was able to reach a winning ending, but even then it took a large amount of work (and a few inaccurate moves by me) before the game was put to bed.
Messi000 (1958) - shaunpress (2273)
Let's Play! Chess.com, 09.05.2015
To be honest I don't mind this format, as it means I have to look at my game on a regular basis. On the ICCF server I often fall into the trap of briefly looking at a game, then coming back to it over a week, before realising I have to play 5 moves in 2 days. On the other hand it seems a little easier for me to play a 'casual' move in the turn based format, as the following game demonstrates.
At various points I thought I had found a winning line, only to realise it didn't quite work. And when I did find a winning line I immediately undid my good work by castling, allowing my opponent to recover some material. Fortunately I was able to reach a winning ending, but even then it took a large amount of work (and a few inaccurate moves by me) before the game was put to bed.
Messi000 (1958) - shaunpress (2273)
Let's Play! Chess.com, 09.05.2015
1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. g3 g6 4. Nf3 Bg7 5. d3 d6 6. Nd5 f5 7. Bg2 Nce7 8. Nxe7 Nxe7 9. Qb3 c6 10. O-O Rb8 11. Bg5 Be6 12. Qa3 a6 13. Bd2 h6 14. c5 dxc5 15. Qxc5 e4 16. Ne5 b6 17. Qc3 Qd5 18. Bf4 Rd8 19. dxe4 fxe4 20. f3 g5 21. fxe4 Qc5+ 22. Qxc5 bxc5 23. Bf3 h5 24. Nxc6 Nxc6 25. Bxg5 Rb8 26. Rad1 Nd4 27. e5 Bxe5 28. b3 Nxf3+ 29. exf3 O-O 30. Rfe1 Bd4+ 31. Rxd4 cxd4 32. Rxe6 Rxf3 33. Rxa6 Rf5 34. Bf4 Rd8 35. Kf1 d3 36. Ke1 Rc5 37. Bd2 Re5+ 38. Kd1 Re2 39. h4 Rd5 40. Ra8+ Kf7 41. Ra7+ Ke6 42. Ra6+ Kf5 43. Ra4 Rg2 44. Be1 d2 45. Rf4+ Ke6 46. Bf2 Ke5 47. Rf8 Rh2 48. Bg1 Rh1 49. Rf1 Ke6 50. a4 Rf5 51. Rxf5 Rxg1+ 52. Kxd2 Kxf5 53. Kd3 Ke5 54. Kc4 Kd6 55. b4 Rxg3 56. a5 Rg4+ 57. Kb5 Kc7 58. a6 Rxh4 59. a7 Kb7 60. a8Q+ Kxa8 0-1
Monday, 27 July 2015
No more English GM's?
I was having a look at the field for the 2015 British Championship and I noticed a strange distribution of titled players. The Championship has done well to attract 11 GM's, but oddly, only has 3 IM's playing. In a similar fashion, there are 12 players rated above 2400, but only another 9 above 2200.
I'm pretty sure this situation has occurred somewhat regularly in recent years, and have seen discussion of this situation on the English Chess Forum. It is a little similar (on a larger scale) to what happened with the Australian Open in 2007 (4 GM's and only 2 IM's), and I wonder why it is so.
Some of the given reasons have to do with the likelihood of winning prizes against the cost of playing, which if true, does strike me as odd. An admission that you don't quite have what it takes to move to the next level is one that most top players would never openly make, but essentially it seems to be saying the same thing. Conditions might be another issue, although the solution to that is of course becoming a GM yourself. Otherwise I am at a loss to come up with a rational reason for the absence of GM's, unless it is simply that England has generated as many GM's as it can, and there are no more left to be had!
I'm pretty sure this situation has occurred somewhat regularly in recent years, and have seen discussion of this situation on the English Chess Forum. It is a little similar (on a larger scale) to what happened with the Australian Open in 2007 (4 GM's and only 2 IM's), and I wonder why it is so.
Some of the given reasons have to do with the likelihood of winning prizes against the cost of playing, which if true, does strike me as odd. An admission that you don't quite have what it takes to move to the next level is one that most top players would never openly make, but essentially it seems to be saying the same thing. Conditions might be another issue, although the solution to that is of course becoming a GM yourself. Otherwise I am at a loss to come up with a rational reason for the absence of GM's, unless it is simply that England has generated as many GM's as it can, and there are no more left to be had!
Sunday, 26 July 2015
2015 ANU Open Day 2
IM Andrew Brown has become the first player to win the ANU Open three years in a row, after an exciting final round. He started the day with a win of overnight leader IM Junta Ikeda, before maintaining his lead with a win over Jason Hu. In the final round he was paired against WIM Emma Guo, and after overpressing an attack fund himself down a piece. However he had some compensation, in the shape of a trapped opposition bishop, but the smart money was on an upset win for Guo. But with both players running short og time, he continually frustrated Guo's attempts to promote a pawn, and after one final misstep, was able to draw the game.
His score of 6/7 (+5=2) was enough to win the tournament by half a point over IM Anton Smirnov. Smirnov started the day badly, with a loss to Jason Hu, before finishing with 2 wins, including a crucial last round win over IM Junta Ikeda. As a result Ikeda finished in a tie for third place with Canberra junior player Michael Kethro.
The Minor event (Under 1600) was won by Nhorval Valle, who started the day with 2 more wins (to go with the 4 from yesterday) before being held to a draw by Hikaru Oka in the final round. The draw by Oka gave him a share of 2nd place, alongside Jared Plane and Bazli Karattiyattil. The 56 player event was very competitive with Joshua Lee (5/7) winning the Under 1200 prize and Ruofan Xu (4.5/7) winning the Under 1000 prize.
With 83 players taking part, this years event was a big success. The tournament ran smoothly (if a little overtime on the first day), and the competitors enjoyed themselves. The 7 round format can be tough (especially on older players), but everyone got their money's worth.
The rest of the ANU Chess Festival sees the ANU High Schools and Primary Schools Teams Championships, and numbers are already looking good for these events. Thanks for a succesful tournament should go to Shun Ikeda, Paul Dunn and IA Charles Zworestine, as well as all the volunteers who helped throughout the weekend.
Brown,Andrew - Guo,Emma [D85]
2015 ANU Open Canberra, Australia (7.1), 26.07.2015
His score of 6/7 (+5=2) was enough to win the tournament by half a point over IM Anton Smirnov. Smirnov started the day badly, with a loss to Jason Hu, before finishing with 2 wins, including a crucial last round win over IM Junta Ikeda. As a result Ikeda finished in a tie for third place with Canberra junior player Michael Kethro.
The Minor event (Under 1600) was won by Nhorval Valle, who started the day with 2 more wins (to go with the 4 from yesterday) before being held to a draw by Hikaru Oka in the final round. The draw by Oka gave him a share of 2nd place, alongside Jared Plane and Bazli Karattiyattil. The 56 player event was very competitive with Joshua Lee (5/7) winning the Under 1200 prize and Ruofan Xu (4.5/7) winning the Under 1000 prize.
With 83 players taking part, this years event was a big success. The tournament ran smoothly (if a little overtime on the first day), and the competitors enjoyed themselves. The 7 round format can be tough (especially on older players), but everyone got their money's worth.
The rest of the ANU Chess Festival sees the ANU High Schools and Primary Schools Teams Championships, and numbers are already looking good for these events. Thanks for a succesful tournament should go to Shun Ikeda, Paul Dunn and IA Charles Zworestine, as well as all the volunteers who helped throughout the weekend.
Brown,Andrew - Guo,Emma [D85]
2015 ANU Open Canberra, Australia (7.1), 26.07.2015
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. e4 Nxc3 6. bxc3 Bg7 7. Bb5+ Bd7 8. Be2 c5 9. Nf3 O-O 10. h3 Nc6 11. O-O b6 12. d5 Ne5 13. Ne1 b5 14. f4 Nc4 15. e5 Nb6 16. Bf3 Rc8 17. Nd3 e6 18. d6 Nd5 19. f5 Nxc3 20. Qe1 Nd5 21. Bxd5 exd5 22. f6 Bh8 23. Qh4 Re8 24. Qh6 Re6 25. Rf4 Qf8 26. Qg5 h6 27. Qg3 c4 28. Rh4 cxd3 29. Bxh6 Qe8 30. Bf4 d2 31. Rd1 Rc1 32. Rxc1 dxc1Q+ 33. Bxc1 Rxe5 34. Qf4 Re1+ 35. Kf2 Qe2+ 36. Kg3 Qe5 37. Qxe5 Rxe5 38. Rf4 Re6 39. Bb2 Rxd6 40. Bd4 a5 41. Kh4 Rc6 42. g4 b4 43. g5 Rc2 44. Rf2 Rc4 45. Rd2 a4 46. Kg3 Be6 47. h4 Kf8 48. Kf4 Ke8 49. Ke5 Kd7 50. Rh2 b3 51. axb3 axb3 52. Rb2 Rb4 53. Rh2 Kc6 54. Rd2 Bg4 55. Rg2 Bf3 56. Rf2 Be4 57. Re2 Bc2 58. Rd2 Kb5 59. Bb2 Be4 60. Rd4 Rc4 61. Rd2 Rc2 62. Rxc2 bxc2 63. Kd4 Kb4 64. Bc1 Kb3 65. Ke3 Ka2 66. Kd2 d4 67. Ke1 d3 68. Kd2 Kb3 69. Ke3 Bf5 70. Kd2 Kc4 71. Ba3 Kb3 72. Bc1 Be4 73. Ke3 Bf5 74. Kd2 Kc4 75. Bb2 Kd5 76. Ke3 Be4 77. Bc1 Ke5 78. Bb2+ Kf5 79. Bc1 Ke5 80. Bb2+ Kd5 81. Kd2 Bf5 82. Ke3 Kd6 83. Ba3+ Ke6 84. Bb2 Bxf6 85. gxf6 c1Q+ 86. Bxc1 Kxf6 87. Kf4 Ke6 88. Bd2 Bh3 89. Kg3 Bf1 90. Kf4 Kd5 91. Bc3 Kc4 92. Ba5 Kb3 93. Ke3 Kc2 94. Bb4 f5 95. Ba5 f4+ 96. Kxf4 d2 97. Bxd2 Kxd2 98. Kg5 Bd3 99. h5 1/2-1/2
Saturday, 25 July 2015
2015 ANU Open Day 1
At the end of a gruelling 4 round day, IM Junta Ikeda is the outright leader of the 2015 ANU Open. He was the only player to go 4 from 4, beating IM Richard Jones in round 3, and CM jason Hu in round 4. He is closely followed by IM's Anton Smirnov and Andrew Brown, who drew their round 3 game, and won all the rest.
The tournament has attracted 83 players across the 2 sections (27 in Open, 56 in Minor), which is up 20 players from last year. The Open is headed by 4 IM's (Smirnov, Jones, Ikeda and Brown), with 5 other players rated above 2000. Tomorrow mornings round sees an all local clash on board 1, with Ikeda and Brown playing for the lead, going into the final two rounds.
In the Minor (Under 1600) section David Zanon, Jared Plane and Nhorval Valle share the lead with 4/4. Apart from the surprise performance of the unrated Valle, Jaykob Brooks-Johnson (3/4) and Nellie Clayden (2/4 in her first ever tournament) are among some of the lower rated players who have impressed on the first day.
Full results from the tournament, as well as a link to live coverage of the top two boards can be found at http://tournaments.streetchess.net/anu2015/ And if you missed some of today's action, here is the exciting round 3 game between IM Andrew Brown and IM Anton Smirnov, where Brown failed to find the win when down to his last seconds, and Smirnov held on the draw the game.
Brown,Andrew - Smirnov,Anton [D15]
2015 ANU Open Canberra, Australia (3.1), 25.07.2015
The tournament has attracted 83 players across the 2 sections (27 in Open, 56 in Minor), which is up 20 players from last year. The Open is headed by 4 IM's (Smirnov, Jones, Ikeda and Brown), with 5 other players rated above 2000. Tomorrow mornings round sees an all local clash on board 1, with Ikeda and Brown playing for the lead, going into the final two rounds.
In the Minor (Under 1600) section David Zanon, Jared Plane and Nhorval Valle share the lead with 4/4. Apart from the surprise performance of the unrated Valle, Jaykob Brooks-Johnson (3/4) and Nellie Clayden (2/4 in her first ever tournament) are among some of the lower rated players who have impressed on the first day.
Full results from the tournament, as well as a link to live coverage of the top two boards can be found at http://tournaments.streetchess.net/anu2015/ And if you missed some of today's action, here is the exciting round 3 game between IM Andrew Brown and IM Anton Smirnov, where Brown failed to find the win when down to his last seconds, and Smirnov held on the draw the game.
Brown,Andrew - Smirnov,Anton [D15]
2015 ANU Open Canberra, Australia (3.1), 25.07.2015
1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 dxc4 4. e4 b5 5. Nf3 Nf6 6. e5 Nd5 7. Be2 e6 8. O-O Nd7 9. a4 N7b6 10. axb5 Nxc3 11. bxc3 cxb5 12. Ng5 Bb7 13. Bh5 g6 14. Bf3 Qd7 15. Bxb7 Qxb7 16. Qg4 h5 17. Qf4 Nd5 18. Qf3 Qd7 19. Ra6 b4 20. Ne4 Rc8 21. cxb4 Bxb4 22. Ba3 Kf8 23. Bxb4+ Nxb4 24. Qa3 Rb8 25. Rxa7 Qxd4 26. Ng5 Kg8 27. Rxf7 Qxe5 28. Qa7 Nc6 29. Qd7 Nd4 30. f4 Ne2+ 31. Kh1 Nxf4 32. Rh7 Rf8 33. Rxh8+ Qxh8 34. Nxe6 Qb2 35. Nxf4 Qe5 36. g3 g5 37. Qc6 gxf4 38. Qxc4+ Kh8 39. gxf4 Qf5 40. Qd4+ Kh7 41. Rg1 Rg8 42. Rxg8 Kxg8 43. Qc4+ Kh7 44. Qc7+ Kg6 45. Qd6+ Kh7 46. Qe7+ Kg6 47. Qe8+ Kh7 48. Qe7+ Kg6 49. Qe3 Qd5+ 50. Kg1 Kf5 51. Kf2 Qa2+ 52. Kf3 Qd5+ 53. Kg3 Qg8+ 54. Kf2 Qa2+ 55. Kg1 Qb1+ 56. Kg2 Qa2+ 57. Kh3 Qd5 58. Kh4 Qd8+ 59. Kh3 Qd5 60. Qf2 Qd3+ 61. Kg2 Qe4+ 62. Kg3 Qd3+ 63. Kh4 Qd8+ 64. Kh3 Qd3+ 65. Qg3 Qd8 66. Qf3 Qe8 67. Kg3 Qg8+ 68. Kh4 Qd8+ 69. Kh3 Qe8 70. Qg3 Qd8 71. Qe3 Qd5 72. Kg3 Qg8+ 73. Kf2 Qa2+ 74. Kg1 Qb1+ 75. Kg2 Qa2+ 76. Kh3 Qd5 77. Qf2 Qd3+ 78. Qg3 Qf1+ 79. Kh4 Qxf4+ 80. Kxh5 Qf1 81. Qg6+ Ke5 82. Qe8+ Kd6 83. Qd8+ Ke6 84. Qg8+ Ke7 85. Qg7+ Ke8 86. h4 Qf7+ 87. Qg6 Kf8 88. Kh6 Qxg6+ 89. Kxg6 Kg8 90. h5 Kh8 91. h6 Kg8 92. h7+ Kh8 93. Kh6 1/2-1/2
Friday, 24 July 2015
ANU Chess Festival Day 1
The 2015 ANU Chess Festival began with its now traditional city chess activity at King O'Malley's Pub. While in years past it was a lunchtime simul, it has since been replaced by a teams blitz event. This year 9 teams of 2 players turned up for the 5 round swiss, which turned out to be a close affair. Some of the teams represented the local clubs (ANU Scholars, Belco Blitzers), some were work related (The Budget Busters from Treasury/Finance) while others were made up of players who shared a common interest.
Going into the last round the ANU Scholars lead the next 4 teams by half a point (7 v 6.5), but a 2-0 win by the Scholars over Readings Rebels left them a full point ahead of the Belco Blitzers. This was the second time in 3 years that the ANU Chess Club has provided the winning team, which for this year consisted of Harry Press and Miles Patterson. It was a fun event, and the only regret from the players was that it should have run for longer!
Tomorrow the 2015 ANU Open begins at the ANU School of Art. At this stage there are 76 players entered (once I excluded Magnus Carlsen, Gary Kasparov and Hikaru Nakamura from the entry list), and a few more should enter on the day. The tournament website is as tournaments.streetchess.net/anu2015 and I hope to broadcast the top 2 games from the open each round.
Going into the last round the ANU Scholars lead the next 4 teams by half a point (7 v 6.5), but a 2-0 win by the Scholars over Readings Rebels left them a full point ahead of the Belco Blitzers. This was the second time in 3 years that the ANU Chess Club has provided the winning team, which for this year consisted of Harry Press and Miles Patterson. It was a fun event, and the only regret from the players was that it should have run for longer!
Tomorrow the 2015 ANU Open begins at the ANU School of Art. At this stage there are 76 players entered (once I excluded Magnus Carlsen, Gary Kasparov and Hikaru Nakamura from the entry list), and a few more should enter on the day. The tournament website is as tournaments.streetchess.net/anu2015 and I hope to broadcast the top 2 games from the open each round.
Thursday, 23 July 2015
Chess and doping
The topic of random drug testing in chess events is a subject I am well acquainted with (see here for some of the details), so when the topic comes up I do take an interest.
The latest piece on this topic comes from WIM Salomeja Zaksaite, who discusses it in terms of general issues, and legal ones. Possibly the most interesting point concerns whether doping control in chess is "proportionate to the aim that is being sought to achieve?" The seems to hint that the restrictiveness caused drug testing might actually fall foul of the requirements of the European Court of Human Rights. As a result anyone who refuse to take a test (as I did) and is sanctioned may be able to have this sanction overturned.
But I suggest you read the paper yourself (I do get a mention btw) and make up your own mind about what the author is saying. It is worth noting that since 2004 FIDE did change their drug testing policy so that only players rated 2700 and above get tested, at least removing the burden on the vast majority of competitors.
The latest piece on this topic comes from WIM Salomeja Zaksaite, who discusses it in terms of general issues, and legal ones. Possibly the most interesting point concerns whether doping control in chess is "proportionate to the aim that is being sought to achieve?" The seems to hint that the restrictiveness caused drug testing might actually fall foul of the requirements of the European Court of Human Rights. As a result anyone who refuse to take a test (as I did) and is sanctioned may be able to have this sanction overturned.
But I suggest you read the paper yourself (I do get a mention btw) and make up your own mind about what the author is saying. It is worth noting that since 2004 FIDE did change their drug testing policy so that only players rated 2700 and above get tested, at least removing the burden on the vast majority of competitors.
Wednesday, 22 July 2015
Biel Chess Festivel
The annual Biel Chess Festival began the other day, and already there has been plenty of entertaining chess. Normally I am not a fan of the 6 player double round robin (as it leads to a lot of shadow boxing), but the organisers have invited a fairly combative group of players. No one in the top 15, but a close grouping of players ranked 17 to 31 (plus 19 year old Richard Rapport). As a result it is less of a battle between the players plus seconds, and more of a battle between clashing ideas.
The feature game from round 2 was the Rapport v Adams game. Rapport played a Kings Gambit (becoming a more frequent visitor at the top these days), while Adams responded with a defence that was popular in the 1970's but one I don't see so much these days. In a game that would make "structural purists" gasp in horror, Rapport looked to be winning, until Adams found a nice counter attack to force a draw.
Alongside the GM event is a Masters tournament, which contains plenty of GM's as well. Of interest (at least to me) are two non GM competitors, IM John-Paul Wallace (AUS), and FM Sunil Weeramantry, who is GM Hikaru Nakamura's step father.
Rapport,R (2671) - Adams,Mi (2740) [C36]
48th Biel GM 2015 Biel SUI (2), 21.07.2015
The feature game from round 2 was the Rapport v Adams game. Rapport played a Kings Gambit (becoming a more frequent visitor at the top these days), while Adams responded with a defence that was popular in the 1970's but one I don't see so much these days. In a game that would make "structural purists" gasp in horror, Rapport looked to be winning, until Adams found a nice counter attack to force a draw.
Alongside the GM event is a Masters tournament, which contains plenty of GM's as well. Of interest (at least to me) are two non GM competitors, IM John-Paul Wallace (AUS), and FM Sunil Weeramantry, who is GM Hikaru Nakamura's step father.
Rapport,R (2671) - Adams,Mi (2740) [C36]
48th Biel GM 2015 Biel SUI (2), 21.07.2015
1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d5 4. exd5 Nf6 5. Be2 Nxd5 6. c4 Ne7 7. Nc3 Ng6 8. h4 Be7 9. h5 Nh4 10. Nd5 Nc6 11. d4 Nxg2+ 12. Kf1 Ne3+ 13. Nxe3 fxe3 14. d5 Nb4 15. a3 Na6 16. Bxe3 O-O 17. Qc2 Bg4 18. h6 g6 19. Qc3 Bf6 20. Bd4 Be7 21. c5 Re8 22. c6 Bf8 23. cxb7 Rb8 24. Bxa6 Qxd5 25. Kf2 Bxf3 26. Bc4 Re2+ 27. Bxe2 Bxh1 28. Rxh1 Qxh1 29. Qxc7 Qh4+ 30. Kf1 Qh1+ 31. Kf2 Qh4+ 32. Kf1 Qh1+ 33. Kf2 1/2-1/2
I missed International Chess Day
July 20th is International Chess Day, but for some reason I missed it. Possibly due to time zone differences, as the day is almost over when Europe wakes up. I am not sure how widely it is celebrated, but everyone seemed to get an email from Kirsan Ilyumzhinov thanking us for being chess players (If you didn't just ask to see my copy)
I did see a smattering of related news, where some cities organised simuls, but I am not sure it was really celebrated with any great gusto. Something to work on for next year perhaps?
I did see a smattering of related news, where some cities organised simuls, but I am not sure it was really celebrated with any great gusto. Something to work on for next year perhaps?
Monday, 20 July 2015
Play with your city
I have come across another novel design for a chess set, this time using architectural themes for piece design. Skyline Chess have used some iconic buildings from the London skyline to symbolise chess pieces, with the pieces either being matched to form, or importance. For example rook are represented by Big Ben, while the Canary Wharf building is the King (money never sleeps!). The most interesting choice is of the London Eye as the knight, but I guess it makes sense, in terms of where knights can end up!
This concept can obviously be extended to other cities of the world, although some may be easier to adapt than others. Sydney has a few obvious candidates (Opera House, Harbour Bridge, Centrepoint Tower), although Canberra may find it a little harder. If I had to have a stab at it I might choose
This concept can obviously be extended to other cities of the world, although some may be easier to adapt than others. Sydney has a few obvious candidates (Opera House, Harbour Bridge, Centrepoint Tower), although Canberra may find it a little harder. If I had to have a stab at it I might choose
- King = Parliament House
- Queen = High Court
- Bishop = National Library
- Knight = Captain Cook Fountain
- Rook = War Memorial
- Pawn = Black Mountain Tower
Sunday, 19 July 2015
Player or players wanted
The Correspondence Chess League of Australia is looking for a female player to represent the country at the 10th Ladies Olympiad, which starts on 1 September 2015. Unlike the OTB Olympiad, this Olympiad will not cost you anything except time, as all the games are played over the internet.
Australia currently has 3 players for the team, but needs a board 4 player to take part. There is no requirement to have played Correspondence Chess before, although experience at online chess is helpful.
If you fit the bill, and wish to represent Australia at the international level, feel free to get in touch with me as soon as possible. The deadline for submitting a complete team is pretty close, and so speed is of the essence.
Australia currently has 3 players for the team, but needs a board 4 player to take part. There is no requirement to have played Correspondence Chess before, although experience at online chess is helpful.
If you fit the bill, and wish to represent Australia at the international level, feel free to get in touch with me as soon as possible. The deadline for submitting a complete team is pretty close, and so speed is of the essence.
And slowly it dawns on you
When I get inspired to study some 'hacking' chess, I often look at the games of Joseph Henry Blackburne aka 'The Black Death'. He was an attacking player of the first order, and his collection of games remains one of my favourites. Indeed, when looking through his games I often come across new ideas or surprise finishes that I have not seen before.
When I first saw the moves to the following game I thought it must have ended by mistake (or the moves were cut off in my database). Then it dawned on me that Black was in serious trouble, no matter what they did (eg 12 ... Rf8 13.Qh5) I suspect that this was the same experience that his opponent had, as he played no further moves in this position!
Blackburne,Joseph Henry - De Vere,Cecil Valentine [C60]
BCA-02.Challenge Cup London, 1868
When I first saw the moves to the following game I thought it must have ended by mistake (or the moves were cut off in my database). Then it dawned on me that Black was in serious trouble, no matter what they did (eg 12 ... Rf8 13.Qh5) I suspect that this was the same experience that his opponent had, as he played no further moves in this position!
Blackburne,Joseph Henry - De Vere,Cecil Valentine [C60]
BCA-02.Challenge Cup London, 1868
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nge7 4. c3 Ng6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4 Be7 7. Nc3 O-O 8. h4 Re8 9. Bc4 Bb4 10. Kf1 Bxc3 11. bxc3 d6 12. Ng5 1-0
Friday, 17 July 2015
Being distracted by sport
Winding down from the Oceania Zonal, I find myself increasingly distracted by late night sport. The collision of Australia v England in the Cricket, the Tour de France, the British Open Gold, as well as various other options has resulted in late nights, and less of a focus on chess. Not that I am complaining, as every now and then the brain needs a break of 64 black and white squares.
However it will ramp up again in the next week, with the 2015 ANU Open. As this event is part of the ANU Chess Festival, there will be other events (Blitz, Schools tournaments) to go with it, meaning I should have my hands full.
Speaking of the Oceania Zonal, almost all the games from the event have been uploaded. These can be found at chess-results.com, as part of the tournament results (just some round 8 games in the open to go). Many thanks to Alana Chibnall, Charles Zworestine, Brian Jones, Ian Rogers, Cathy Rogers, David Webster and Nick Cooper for typing these in (apologies if I have missed anyone btw)
And speaking of sport, Steve Smith just brought up his double century!
However it will ramp up again in the next week, with the 2015 ANU Open. As this event is part of the ANU Chess Festival, there will be other events (Blitz, Schools tournaments) to go with it, meaning I should have my hands full.
Speaking of the Oceania Zonal, almost all the games from the event have been uploaded. These can be found at chess-results.com, as part of the tournament results (just some round 8 games in the open to go). Many thanks to Alana Chibnall, Charles Zworestine, Brian Jones, Ian Rogers, Cathy Rogers, David Webster and Nick Cooper for typing these in (apologies if I have missed anyone btw)
And speaking of sport, Steve Smith just brought up his double century!
Wednesday, 15 July 2015
2015 ANU Open
The 2015 Australian National University Open is just a week and a half away. This year is the 23rd running of this event, which started in the early 1990's, to encourage more people to visit Canberra in winter!
In fact winter is one of the best times to visit Canberra, as while it may be chilly, the weather is often fantastic (clear blue skies and sunshine!). And with it being the off season for tourists, you can get to see the cities attractions while avoiding the crowds (Questacon, Old Parliament House, and the National Gallery are all good places to see).
Of course the 23rd ANU Open should be the main attraction, with a prize fund of $3300, and a strong field already shaping up. As in previous years the tournament is split into 2 sections, with an Open, and an U/1600 event. First prize in the Open is $1000, while the Under 1600 has $500 as the top prize.
Further details are
In fact winter is one of the best times to visit Canberra, as while it may be chilly, the weather is often fantastic (clear blue skies and sunshine!). And with it being the off season for tourists, you can get to see the cities attractions while avoiding the crowds (Questacon, Old Parliament House, and the National Gallery are all good places to see).
Of course the 23rd ANU Open should be the main attraction, with a prize fund of $3300, and a strong field already shaping up. As in previous years the tournament is split into 2 sections, with an Open, and an U/1600 event. First prize in the Open is $1000, while the Under 1600 has $500 as the top prize.
Further details are
- Venue: ANU School of Art, Childers St, Acton (10 minutes walk from the city)
- Dates: Saturday 25th, and Sunday 26th July 2015
- Format: 7 round swiss (4 rounds Saturday, 3 rounds Sunday)
- Time Control: G60m+10s
- Entry Fee: $70 Adult, $50 Concession (if registered before 18 July)
If you wish to register online, simply go to http://vesus.org/festivals/2015-anu-chess-festival/ and click on the event you wish to play in. You will get the earlybird discount if you register, even if you do not pay until the day of the event! (NB The Vesus system uses FIDE ratings for registered players, so it may show Over 1600 rated players in the Under 1600 event. Be assured these players have ratings Under 1600 on the ACF list)
And if you get to Canberra early, or are a local looking for some fun, then drop into King O'Malleys on Friday from 5pm for the ACT teams Blitz Event. It is for teams of 2, and is a 5 round swiss. No entry fee and anyone can come and play!
(NB I am an unpaid official for this event)
Finished my first event
Apart from being an International Arbiter, I have started directing some tournaments for the ICCF (International Correspondence Chess Federation). The roles has a slightly different title (Tournament Director) but the responsibilities are generally the same. Nonetheless it is a little easier to be a TD than an IA, as my role is a lot more hands off. With most CC played on servers these days, there are no worries about illegal moves, forgetting to press the clock, or players disturbing their opponents.
Mostly it is dealing with queries about opponents who have 'gone silent', claims for wins on time, and draw claims. Otherwise the process (including result collection) is mainly automated.
Happily I have had very few issues so far, and just this evening, completed my first tournament. It was a round robin for the North America/Pacific Zone (NZPF) and was won by Daniel Fisher (USA). I am pleased to say there were no dramas with this tournament and it was quite exciting, with the top four all within a point of each other. I'm pleased it was a pretty easy introduction to CC arbiting, and I hope to direct many more events in the future.
Fisher,Daniel E - Rogers,Dustin
NAPZ/WS/O/52 ICCF, 23.01.2015
Mostly it is dealing with queries about opponents who have 'gone silent', claims for wins on time, and draw claims. Otherwise the process (including result collection) is mainly automated.
Happily I have had very few issues so far, and just this evening, completed my first tournament. It was a round robin for the North America/Pacific Zone (NZPF) and was won by Daniel Fisher (USA). I am pleased to say there were no dramas with this tournament and it was quite exciting, with the top four all within a point of each other. I'm pleased it was a pretty easy introduction to CC arbiting, and I hope to direct many more events in the future.
Fisher,Daniel E - Rogers,Dustin
NAPZ/WS/O/52 ICCF, 23.01.2015
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 b6 5. Bd3 Bb7 6. Nf3 O-O 7. O-O Bxc3 8. bxc3 Ne4 9. Nd2 Nxd2 10. Qxd2 d6 11. Qc2 h6 12. e4 c5 13. f4 Nd7 14. Qe2 f6 15. f5 exf5 16. Rxf5 Rf7 17. Rf2 Qe7 18. Bd2 Re8 19. Re1 Nf8 20. Qg4 Kh8 21. Qh5 Qd7 22. e5 dxe5 23. Bf5 Qc7 24. d5 Kg8 25. Bxh6 gxh6 26. Re3 Ree7 27. Qxh6 Qd8 28. Rff3 Rc7 29. Rg3+ Rg7 30. Rh3 Rh7 31. Bxh7+ Nxh7 32. d6 Qxd6 33. Rd3 Qf8 34. Rdg3+ Ng5 35. Rxg5+ fxg5 36. Qh8+ Kf7 37. Qxe5 Qd8 38. Qxc7+ Qxc7 39. Rh7+ Ke6 40. Rxc7 Ba6 41. Rxa7 Bxc4 42. a4 Kd5 43. Rb7 Kc6 44. Rg7 Bb3 45. Rg6+ Kc7 46. Rxg5 Bxa4 47. h4 Kc6 48. h5 b5 49. Rg6+ Kd5 50. h6 Bc2 51. h7 Bxg6 52. h8Q Bd3 53. Qg8+ 1-0
Monday, 13 July 2015
Push counters for clocks
A few days ago I was asked to comment on whether "Push Counters" (to use their proper name) should be used in chess competitions. For those unfamiliar, some models of Digital Clocks (including all official FIDE clocks) can keep track of the number of times the clock has been pressed during the game. This allows the clock to add additional time for second and subsequent time controls.
The correctness of this process assumes that the number of pushes equals the number of moves played. If players accidentally push the clock too many times, extra time may be added before the first time control has been reached. On the other hand, if a player forgets to press their clock, then players may wonder why they have not been given extra time.
When this feature first came in, I was wary of using it. I figured that there would be too many problems, and arbiters would have to interrupt games at move 38-42 to fix these issues. It turns out that my fears were unfounded.
The first big event where I used "push counters" was at the 2012 Queenstown tournament in New Zealand. It was a large event, and it had a reasonably complicated time control (40/100m, 20/50m, G/15m+30s per move from move 1). The clock needed to keep track of 40 moves, then a further 20 moves to add the required time. Apart from being a little slow to set before the first round, there were very few problems during the event. The number of extra/insufficient pushes problems could be counted on 1 hand, and in a couple of instances, a fault with the clock was the problem. Certainly the arbiting team checked boards around the first and second time controls, but the system worked as advertised. It also had the added benefit of players feeling a little more comfortable, as they always knew how much time they had available to them.
Since then I have used "push counters" more than I have not. For the Doeberl Cup we use them, and there have been very few problems. At this years Zonal, there was 1 major problem (caused by players hitting the clock too many times), and a couple of minor ones (not hitting the clock enough), but not even close to a number that would make me rethink using this option.
The alternative, which is to allow the clock to run to 0 before adding time, has its own problems. Anecdotally, players may rush their moves after the time control, worried about what will happen if they allow their clock to run down (As an aside, Magnus Carlsen lost against Topalov in part because he assumed that this system was in place, and expected extra time once his clock reached 0). When this setting has been used, I am often asked by players at the board about when they get extra time, meaning I have to interrupt the game anyway.
There are also some time controls that require the use of a push counter. Some tournaments only start an increment after a certain number of moves (40 or 60), so the clock has to know when this move number has been reached.
As for whether you "must" use this option, the choice is still up to arbiters. The FIDE Arbiters Manual mentions their use, without mandating it. Certainly this setting is not used at the Olympiad, although I think it would be better if it did. And if you are an arbiter I would recommend you do use it, both to gain experience for bigger/more important competitions, and that players seem to prefer having time added when they reach the time control, rather than at some random time afterwards.
The correctness of this process assumes that the number of pushes equals the number of moves played. If players accidentally push the clock too many times, extra time may be added before the first time control has been reached. On the other hand, if a player forgets to press their clock, then players may wonder why they have not been given extra time.
When this feature first came in, I was wary of using it. I figured that there would be too many problems, and arbiters would have to interrupt games at move 38-42 to fix these issues. It turns out that my fears were unfounded.
The first big event where I used "push counters" was at the 2012 Queenstown tournament in New Zealand. It was a large event, and it had a reasonably complicated time control (40/100m, 20/50m, G/15m+30s per move from move 1). The clock needed to keep track of 40 moves, then a further 20 moves to add the required time. Apart from being a little slow to set before the first round, there were very few problems during the event. The number of extra/insufficient pushes problems could be counted on 1 hand, and in a couple of instances, a fault with the clock was the problem. Certainly the arbiting team checked boards around the first and second time controls, but the system worked as advertised. It also had the added benefit of players feeling a little more comfortable, as they always knew how much time they had available to them.
Since then I have used "push counters" more than I have not. For the Doeberl Cup we use them, and there have been very few problems. At this years Zonal, there was 1 major problem (caused by players hitting the clock too many times), and a couple of minor ones (not hitting the clock enough), but not even close to a number that would make me rethink using this option.
The alternative, which is to allow the clock to run to 0 before adding time, has its own problems. Anecdotally, players may rush their moves after the time control, worried about what will happen if they allow their clock to run down (As an aside, Magnus Carlsen lost against Topalov in part because he assumed that this system was in place, and expected extra time once his clock reached 0). When this setting has been used, I am often asked by players at the board about when they get extra time, meaning I have to interrupt the game anyway.
There are also some time controls that require the use of a push counter. Some tournaments only start an increment after a certain number of moves (40 or 60), so the clock has to know when this move number has been reached.
As for whether you "must" use this option, the choice is still up to arbiters. The FIDE Arbiters Manual mentions their use, without mandating it. Certainly this setting is not used at the Olympiad, although I think it would be better if it did. And if you are an arbiter I would recommend you do use it, both to gain experience for bigger/more important competitions, and that players seem to prefer having time added when they reach the time control, rather than at some random time afterwards.
Sunday, 12 July 2015
Australia v Norway - Final result
A fortnight ago an Australian Women's team played a Norwegian Women's team in a 6 board match, hosted by the chess server chess24.com. Despite being outrated on each board the Australian team drew the match 3-3 with Alana Chibnall and Giang Nguyen winning their games. Emma Guo and Leteisha Simmonds drew , while Heather Richards and Alexandra Jule lost. The match went pretty smoothly, although a couple of players were flagged by the server when they possibly still had some time on the clock (1 player from each side).
As part of the publicity from the match WIM Heather Richards did a radio interview with SBS for their Norwegian service, and you can listen to it here. Although the interview is in English, Heather could well have conducted it in Norwegian having spent some time their as a student a number of year ago.
The match was held at the end of a training session for a group of leading Australian female players, held alongside the JETS training squad on the Gold Coast. The good result for the players should be helpful for Australian chess, as it puts forward a number of Olympiad contenders for the 2016 Baku team.
Haug,Marianne W (2042) - Chibnall,Alana (1922) [C60]
AUS vs NOR Women's Online Match, 28.06.2015
As part of the publicity from the match WIM Heather Richards did a radio interview with SBS for their Norwegian service, and you can listen to it here. Although the interview is in English, Heather could well have conducted it in Norwegian having spent some time their as a student a number of year ago.
The match was held at the end of a training session for a group of leading Australian female players, held alongside the JETS training squad on the Gold Coast. The good result for the players should be helpful for Australian chess, as it puts forward a number of Olympiad contenders for the 2016 Baku team.
Haug,Marianne W (2042) - Chibnall,Alana (1922) [C60]
AUS vs NOR Women's Online Match, 28.06.2015
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nge7 4. O-O Ng6 5. Nc3 Bc5 6. d3 O-O 7. Bg5 f6 8. Be3 Bb6 9. Nd5 Bxe3 10. fxe3 Nce7 11. Bc4 Kh8 12. Nxe7 Qxe7 13. Qe1 f5 14. exf5 Rxf5 15. d4 d6 16. dxe5 Nxe5 17. Nxe5 Qxe5 18. Qg3 Qxb2 19. Bd3 Rxf1+ 20. Rxf1 Be6 21. Qh4 Bg8 22. a4 Qe5 23. Rf3 Re8 24. Rh3 h6 25. Qg4 Bd5 26. Qb4 Qa1+ 27. Kf2 Rf8+ 28. Rf3 Bxf3 29. gxf3 Qh1 30. Qe4 Qxh2+ 31. Ke1 Qg1+ 32. Kd2 Qg2+ 33. Kc3 g6 34. Qxb7 Qxf3 35. Qxa7 Qc6+ 0-1
On the topic of titles
Like swallows returning to Capistrano, the discussion of "cheap" titles always comes up around the top of the Oceania Zonal. Usually it is the same characters returning to the debate as well, proving that some people will never be happy.
In the case of the 2015 Oceania Zonal (Open), there was 1 IM (International Master) title, 3 FM (FIDE Master) titles and possibly 38 CM (Candidate Master) titles awarded. In the case of the IM and FM titles, the Australian Chess Federation (all players were from Australia btw) pay the fees for these titles. For the CM title it is up to the player to pay the 50 euro fee.
In the distant past the angst was about players receiving the FIDE Master title. Up until the turn of the millennium a player needed to score 50% in a zonal for recieve the title. This was fine until Zonal's became large swisses (as opposed to smaller Round robins), when events were awarding a large number of titles. As a lot of players received their FM title by getting their rating above 2300, and a lot of newer FM's did not have this rating, there was a lot of argument about who really deserved to be an FM. But given that the FM title was (at the time), the lowest title you could achieve, I never understood why some FM's felt that 'their' title had been devalued by this process, given that it was designed to cover a whole range of strengths.
Nonetheless FIDE introduced a lower title, the Candidate Master title. One change to the title system saw the qualification level for FM's at a zonal (50%) become the new requirement for the CM, while the FM was moved up to the old IM mark (65%). I would have thought this would have made the previously aggrieved FM's happy (and note, I am referring to a couple of specific and well known FM's in Australia), but it seems that the notion that anyone below a certain strength receiving a title somehow devalues their own title. All this shows to be me is a certain fragility of ego, as I don't see how this effects their own achievements.
My take on the whole matter of CM titles is that they are a good thing. For some players it will obviously be a stepping stone to higher titles, but for others, it will be the highest title they are likely to achieve. In both cases it makes sense to take the title, although I understand the reasons why some may not. Personally I would like to see more CM's in the region as it would combat the snobbery that works against taking the title, a snobbery that comes from people, who as I said previously, are never going to be happy anyway.
(Now for a couple of disclaimers: I have received both the CM and FM titles. Both were achieved for performances at the Chess Olympiad earning the CM title in 2008 and the FM title for my performance in the 2002 Olympiad, although it was awarded much later. I recognise that the FM title I earned is a distinct over achievement based on my actual chess strength, but I did score an undefeated 6/9 at a Chess Olympiad to earn it. And while I may have had concerns about taking it at an earlier time, the whole debate about who was a "real" FM actually made it a simple decision for me!
The second is that my son earned the CM title at the 2015 Oceania Zonal. At the time of writing this he has indicated he will not be claiming the title. He feels that as the FM title is an achievable goal, this is what he is aiming for)
In the case of the 2015 Oceania Zonal (Open), there was 1 IM (International Master) title, 3 FM (FIDE Master) titles and possibly 38 CM (Candidate Master) titles awarded. In the case of the IM and FM titles, the Australian Chess Federation (all players were from Australia btw) pay the fees for these titles. For the CM title it is up to the player to pay the 50 euro fee.
In the distant past the angst was about players receiving the FIDE Master title. Up until the turn of the millennium a player needed to score 50% in a zonal for recieve the title. This was fine until Zonal's became large swisses (as opposed to smaller Round robins), when events were awarding a large number of titles. As a lot of players received their FM title by getting their rating above 2300, and a lot of newer FM's did not have this rating, there was a lot of argument about who really deserved to be an FM. But given that the FM title was (at the time), the lowest title you could achieve, I never understood why some FM's felt that 'their' title had been devalued by this process, given that it was designed to cover a whole range of strengths.
Nonetheless FIDE introduced a lower title, the Candidate Master title. One change to the title system saw the qualification level for FM's at a zonal (50%) become the new requirement for the CM, while the FM was moved up to the old IM mark (65%). I would have thought this would have made the previously aggrieved FM's happy (and note, I am referring to a couple of specific and well known FM's in Australia), but it seems that the notion that anyone below a certain strength receiving a title somehow devalues their own title. All this shows to be me is a certain fragility of ego, as I don't see how this effects their own achievements.
My take on the whole matter of CM titles is that they are a good thing. For some players it will obviously be a stepping stone to higher titles, but for others, it will be the highest title they are likely to achieve. In both cases it makes sense to take the title, although I understand the reasons why some may not. Personally I would like to see more CM's in the region as it would combat the snobbery that works against taking the title, a snobbery that comes from people, who as I said previously, are never going to be happy anyway.
(Now for a couple of disclaimers: I have received both the CM and FM titles. Both were achieved for performances at the Chess Olympiad earning the CM title in 2008 and the FM title for my performance in the 2002 Olympiad, although it was awarded much later. I recognise that the FM title I earned is a distinct over achievement based on my actual chess strength, but I did score an undefeated 6/9 at a Chess Olympiad to earn it. And while I may have had concerns about taking it at an earlier time, the whole debate about who was a "real" FM actually made it a simple decision for me!
The second is that my son earned the CM title at the 2015 Oceania Zonal. At the time of writing this he has indicated he will not be claiming the title. He feels that as the FM title is an achievable goal, this is what he is aiming for)
Saturday, 11 July 2015
2015 Oceania Zonal - Final Day
The final day of the 2015 Oceania Zonal saw a surprising and dramatic end to the Open Zonal, with Brodie McClymont beating IM Max Illingworth in the final round. The result allowed McClymont to catch Illingworth on 7.5. IM Anton Smirnov had a chance to join them, but could only draw with Pengyu Chen leaving him on 7, along with FM Malcolm Stephens.
As a result of the two way tie, there was a playoff match between Illingworth and McClymont. Following the playoff format from the World Cup, the players played 2 25m+10s games. In the first game McClymont missed a couple of drawing lines, and two queens (against knight and rook) was enough for Illingworth to go one up. In the second game McClymont had a clear advantage, but failed to capitalise on having queen and rook charging down the h file and after Illingworth set up a successful defence, Brodie offered a draw, conceding the match.
Illingworth is now the Zone 3.6 representative for the World Cup which is being held in Baku later this year. As a consolation, McClymont received a share of first prize, as well as earning the International Master title for sharing first place. FM Malcom Stephens capped a fine tournament with a win over IM Junta Ikeda, therebye finishing third on countback and earning a 9 game IM norm. Chen, Zachary Loh and Kevin O'Chee all earned the FM title (for scoring 6 or above), while there were around 40 player(!) who scored 50% or above, earning the Candidate Matster title (if they wish to claim it).
In the Women's Zonal, WIM Emma Guo beat WFM Layla Timergazi to win the tournament on 7/9. WIM Nancy Lane was outright 2nd on 6.5, while WIM Biljana Dekic and Katherine Quek tied for third on 6. Quek missed out on Bronze on countback, but does become a WFM from this tournament.
As a result of the two way tie, there was a playoff match between Illingworth and McClymont. Following the playoff format from the World Cup, the players played 2 25m+10s games. In the first game McClymont missed a couple of drawing lines, and two queens (against knight and rook) was enough for Illingworth to go one up. In the second game McClymont had a clear advantage, but failed to capitalise on having queen and rook charging down the h file and after Illingworth set up a successful defence, Brodie offered a draw, conceding the match.
Illingworth is now the Zone 3.6 representative for the World Cup which is being held in Baku later this year. As a consolation, McClymont received a share of first prize, as well as earning the International Master title for sharing first place. FM Malcom Stephens capped a fine tournament with a win over IM Junta Ikeda, therebye finishing third on countback and earning a 9 game IM norm. Chen, Zachary Loh and Kevin O'Chee all earned the FM title (for scoring 6 or above), while there were around 40 player(!) who scored 50% or above, earning the Candidate Matster title (if they wish to claim it).
In the Women's Zonal, WIM Emma Guo beat WFM Layla Timergazi to win the tournament on 7/9. WIM Nancy Lane was outright 2nd on 6.5, while WIM Biljana Dekic and Katherine Quek tied for third on 6. Quek missed out on Bronze on countback, but does become a WFM from this tournament.
Thursday, 9 July 2015
2015 Oceania Zonal - Day 6
IM Max Illingworth's charge to first place in the 2015 Oceania Zonal has slowed a little, after drawing with IM Anton Smirnov in round 8. The 26 move draw still leaves Illingworth a full point ahead of the field, but does give a couple of opponents a chance to catch up in the final round. Illingworth is paired against Brodie McClymont, and a win for McClymont would leave both players on 7.5 points. If that does happen, then Smirnov can possibly join them with a win over Pengyu Chen. In the case of two players tieing for first the tournament regulations stipulate a playoff to take place straight after the completion of the round, but in the case of a 3 way tie, the title goes straight to tie-breaks.
The Women's Zonal has a closer finish in store, with WIM Emma Guo holding a half point lead over WIM Nancy Jones. With WIM Biljana Dekic and Kristine Quek only a point behind Guo, there is at least one set of results that could lead to a multiple tie for first. However none of the leaders play each other, so Guo should still be the favourite to win this event.
Last round action starts at 10:30 am tomorrow. Live coverage of the top 5 boards from the open, plus the top board from the Women's Zonal can be found at the tournament web site.
The Women's Zonal has a closer finish in store, with WIM Emma Guo holding a half point lead over WIM Nancy Jones. With WIM Biljana Dekic and Kristine Quek only a point behind Guo, there is at least one set of results that could lead to a multiple tie for first. However none of the leaders play each other, so Guo should still be the favourite to win this event.
Last round action starts at 10:30 am tomorrow. Live coverage of the top 5 boards from the open, plus the top board from the Women's Zonal can be found at the tournament web site.
Wednesday, 8 July 2015
2015 Oceania Zonal - Day 5
IM Max Illingworth has maintained his perfect record in the 2015 Oceania Zonal, scoring his 7th consecutive victory. Today he defeated FM Malcolm Stephens in 26 moves to remain a point ahead of second place. The only player in touching distance of Illingworth is IM Anton Smirnov, and as fate would have it, they play in tomorrow's round. A win for Smirnov would at least give the chasing pack a chance to catch up, while Illingworth would be assured of at least equal first with a draw, regardless of his final round result.
Back in third place are a group of players either hoping for a chance at first, or to score enough points to earn a title. The currently untitled Brodie McClymont would earn an FM title with a draw or win tomorrow, while a win for FM Gene Nakauchi would leave him well placed for an IM norm (earned by the top 3 place getters).
The Women's Zonal sees WIM Emma Guo pushing her lead out to the full point after a couple of results went her way in today's round. A quick draw with WIN Nancy Lane might have allowed WIM Biljana Dekic to catch up, but Dekic lost to WIM Katherine Jarek. With two rounds to play Guo is leading on 5.5/7 and having played her closest rivals is well placed to win this event.
Wallis,Christopher - Smirnov,Anton [D11]
2015 Oceania Zonal (7.2), 08.07.2015
Back in third place are a group of players either hoping for a chance at first, or to score enough points to earn a title. The currently untitled Brodie McClymont would earn an FM title with a draw or win tomorrow, while a win for FM Gene Nakauchi would leave him well placed for an IM norm (earned by the top 3 place getters).
The Women's Zonal sees WIM Emma Guo pushing her lead out to the full point after a couple of results went her way in today's round. A quick draw with WIN Nancy Lane might have allowed WIM Biljana Dekic to catch up, but Dekic lost to WIM Katherine Jarek. With two rounds to play Guo is leading on 5.5/7 and having played her closest rivals is well placed to win this event.
Wallis,Christopher - Smirnov,Anton [D11]
2015 Oceania Zonal (7.2), 08.07.2015
1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e3 e6 5. b3 Nbd7 6. Bb2 Ne4 7. Bd3 Bb4+ 8. Nbd2 f5 9. O-O O-O 10. Qc2 Qf6 11. c5 Ba5 12. Bxe4 fxe4 13. Ne1 Qh6 14. a3 Bc7 15. f4 Nf6 16. Qd1 e5 17. g3 exf4 18. exf4 Bg4 19. Qc2 Bh3 20. Ng2 Bxg2 21. Kxg2 Ng4 0-1
2015 Oceania Zonal - Day 4
IM Max Illingworth has extended his lead in the 2015 Oceania Zonal to a full point, after winning his round 5&6 games. He defeated 2nd seed IM Moulthun Ly in the morning round, and 4th seed IM Junta Ikeda in the afternoon round. With 6/6 he leads a pack of players on 5 points, made up of IM Anton Smirnov, Brodie McClymont, FM Malcolm Stephens and FM Chris Wallis. FM Malcolm Stephens continued his good return to top level chess with a win over defending champion IM Igor Bjelobrk. So far he is unbeaten in the tournament, but faces his toughest test tomorrow when he takes on Illingworth.
The Women's Zonal saw a change at the top with WIM Emma Guo overtaking previous leader WIM Biljana Dekic. Guo defeated Dekic in their round 5 game, before beating WIM Katherine Jarek in round 6. Dekic played WIM Nancy Lane is round 6, but was could only draw despite pushing for the full point.
Tomorrow is a single round day with an early start (10:30am). Fill results and links to live coverage can be found at the tournament website.
The Women's Zonal saw a change at the top with WIM Emma Guo overtaking previous leader WIM Biljana Dekic. Guo defeated Dekic in their round 5 game, before beating WIM Katherine Jarek in round 6. Dekic played WIM Nancy Lane is round 6, but was could only draw despite pushing for the full point.
Tomorrow is a single round day with an early start (10:30am). Fill results and links to live coverage can be found at the tournament website.
Monday, 6 July 2015
2015 Oceania Zonal - Day 3
IM Max Illingworth holds the outright led of the 2015 Oceania Zonal, with 4 wins from 4 games. He beat IM Igor Goldenberg on board 1, while his closest challengers drew on Board 2&3. Tomorrow is another double round day (the last), and starts off with Illingworth up against second seed IM Moulthun Ly. Of the 7 players on 3.5/4 Zachary Loh is the real high achiever, beating IM Ari Dale and drawing with IM Igor Bjelobrk in successive rounds. He is currently second on tie-break and is on track for an IM norm.
There were a couple of other meritorious performances from overseas participants. Calvin Prasad drew with FM Malcolm Stephens to reach 3/4, joined by CM Alphaeus Ang who beat IM Ari Dale. PNG rep Stuart Fancy also scored his 3rd win of the tournament to keep his good run going.
In the Women's Zonal WIM Biljana Dekic leads with 4/4. After a slow start WIM Emma Guo has moved up to 3/4, and they play in tomorrow mornings game. With the rest of the field at least another half point back, this might be the game that decides the tournament.
Illingworth,Max (2506) - Goldenberg,Igor (2341) [A00]
Oceania Zonal 2015 Sydney, Australia (4.1), 06.07.2015
There were a couple of other meritorious performances from overseas participants. Calvin Prasad drew with FM Malcolm Stephens to reach 3/4, joined by CM Alphaeus Ang who beat IM Ari Dale. PNG rep Stuart Fancy also scored his 3rd win of the tournament to keep his good run going.
In the Women's Zonal WIM Biljana Dekic leads with 4/4. After a slow start WIM Emma Guo has moved up to 3/4, and they play in tomorrow mornings game. With the rest of the field at least another half point back, this might be the game that decides the tournament.
Illingworth,Max (2506) - Goldenberg,Igor (2341) [A00]
Oceania Zonal 2015 Sydney, Australia (4.1), 06.07.2015
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e6 5. Nc3 d6 6. g4 Nge7 7. Be3 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 Nc6 9. Qd2 a6 10. O-O-O Be7 11. f4 b5 12. Kb1 Bb7 13. g5 Qc7 14. Bg2 O-O 15. h4 Rac8 16. Qf2 Bd8 17. h5 Na5 18. Rd3 Nc4 19. Bc1 Qc5 20. Qxc5 dxc5 21. b3 Nb6 22. Rg3 Rc7 23. g6 fxg6 24. hxg6 h6 25. Bh3 Re8 26. Rd1 Rce7 27. Be3 Nd7 28. f5 Bc7 29. Rg2 Nf8 30. Bxc5 Rd7 31. Rf1 exf5 32. Bxf5 Rdd8 33. Nd5 Be5 34. Rd2 Kh8 35. Rfd1 Bc8 36. c3 Ne6 37. Be7 1-0
Oceania Zonal 2015 - Random Games
Thought I might throw out a random selection of interesting games from the 2015 Oceania Zonal. The first is a nice win by IM Stephen Solomon over FM Michael Steadman
Solomon,Stephen - Steadman,Michael [B06]
2015 Oceania Zonal (3.5), 05.07.2015
Solomon,Stephen - Steadman,Michael [B06]
2015 Oceania Zonal (3.5), 05.07.2015
1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7 3. Nc3 d6 4. Be3 a6 5. Qd2 Nd7 6. h4 h6 7. O-O-O b5 8. f4 Bb7 9. h5 b4 10. Nd5 a5 11. hxg6 e6 12. gxf7+ Kxf7 13. Nf3 exd5 14. e5 Ne7 15. g4 dxe5 16. fxe5 Qg8 17. Bd3 Ke8 18. Bxh6 Bxh6 19. Rxh6 Rxh6 20. Qxh6 Qxg4 21. Rf1 Qg8 22. Ng5 Nf8 23. Bh7 Nxh7 24. Nxh7 Qg2 25. Nf6+ Kf7 26. e6+ Kxe6 27. Ng4+ 1-0
2015 Oceania Zonal - Day 2
The second day of the 2015 Oceania Zonal was the first of 2 double round days, and saw the leading pack begin to thin out. The first surprise of the morning round was 2nd seed IM Moulthun Ly being held to a draw by Calvin Prasad of Fiji. This was followed by a number of draws in the afternoon round, with IM Anton Smirnov drawing with FM Malcolm Stephens, IM Junta Ikeda drawing with Brodie McClymont, and Zachary Lo's win over FM Karl Zelesco being the most significant results.
Nonetheless there are still 6 players on a perfect 3/3. IM Max Illingworth leads this group, with IM's Lane, Bjelobrk, Goldenberg, Solomon plus Loh to keep him company.
The women's Zonal has also had its fair share of upsets, with WIM Biljana Dekic the only player on 3/3. Kristine Quek holds outright 2nd on 2.5, ahead of a group of 4 players on 2/3.
Tomorrow is a single round day, with the action starting at 1pm. The top board pairings see Illingworth v Goldenberg, Bjelobrk v Loh, and Lane v Solomon.
Nonetheless there are still 6 players on a perfect 3/3. IM Max Illingworth leads this group, with IM's Lane, Bjelobrk, Goldenberg, Solomon plus Loh to keep him company.
The women's Zonal has also had its fair share of upsets, with WIM Biljana Dekic the only player on 3/3. Kristine Quek holds outright 2nd on 2.5, ahead of a group of 4 players on 2/3.
Tomorrow is a single round day, with the action starting at 1pm. The top board pairings see Illingworth v Goldenberg, Bjelobrk v Loh, and Lane v Solomon.
Saturday, 4 July 2015
2015 Oceania Zonal - Day 1
The 2015 Oceania Zonal began with 103 players in the Open and 14 players in the Women's event. With such big numbers in the Open event (a new record), the gap between the top half and the bottom half was quite large. The top boards all went according to rating, and it wasn't until Board 20 before the first upset was recorded. This was Paul Russell's win over Jason Hu, while both Tom and Henry Slater Jones scored wins over higher rated opponents.
The Women's Zonal had a couple of semi-upsets where the Guo v Anton was quite a roller coaster, before the point was eventually split. Kashish Christian drew with Layla Timergazi, but the rest of the games went according to seeding.
The only real difficulty on the first day was with the live broadcasts (What? No!). Adding to the list of obscure things that can go wrong, a faulty extension cord failed to provide enough juice to the top boards, leading to intermittent coverage. However the problem has been fixed, so 6 boards should be in operation for the rest of the event.
Tomorrow is a double round day, with round 2 starting at 10:30am. The top two boards will be interesting from a Pacific point of view with Stuart Fancy (PNG) and Calvin Prasad (FIJ) up against the top two seeds (Illingworth and Ly).
Kelly, Adam - Illingworth, Max
2015 Oceania Zonal, 2015.07.04
The Women's Zonal had a couple of semi-upsets where the Guo v Anton was quite a roller coaster, before the point was eventually split. Kashish Christian drew with Layla Timergazi, but the rest of the games went according to seeding.
The only real difficulty on the first day was with the live broadcasts (What? No!). Adding to the list of obscure things that can go wrong, a faulty extension cord failed to provide enough juice to the top boards, leading to intermittent coverage. However the problem has been fixed, so 6 boards should be in operation for the rest of the event.
Tomorrow is a double round day, with round 2 starting at 10:30am. The top two boards will be interesting from a Pacific point of view with Stuart Fancy (PNG) and Calvin Prasad (FIJ) up against the top two seeds (Illingworth and Ly).
Kelly, Adam - Illingworth, Max
2015 Oceania Zonal, 2015.07.04
1. d4 g6 2. e4 Bg7 3. c4 d6 4. Nc3 e5 5. Be3 exd4 6. Bxd4 Nf6 7. g3 Nc6 8. Be3 O-O 9. Nge2 Ng4 10. Bf4 Nge5 11. Bxe5 Nxe5 12. Nd4 c6 13. f4 Bg4 14. Be2 Nxc4 15. Bxg4 Ne3 16. Ne6 Nxd1 17. Nxd8 Nxc3 18. Nxb7 Nxe4 19. Bd7 Rab8 20. Bxc6 Nc5 21. Nxc5 dxc5 22. O-O Rxb2 23. Bd5 Rd8 24. Rad1 Bd4+ 25. Rxd4 cxd4 26. Bb3 Re8 27. Bc4 Rc8 28. Bb3 d3 29. Rd1 Rcc2 30. f5 gxf5 31. Kf1 Rf2+ 32. Kg1 Rg2+ 33. Kh1 Rxh2+ 34. Kg1 Rbg2+ 35. Kf1 Rxa2 36. Bxa2 Rh1+ 0-1
A super hack
I quite like a good hack, and this one is one of the best of the modern era. 16 year Wei Yi builds up the usual king side attack, before kicking off the real fun on move 22 with Rxf7. After that it is like a playground game of chasies with the black king running to and fro. A "modern day Morphy" was one description of his play.
Wei Yi - Lazaro Bruzon
Danzhou, 3.07.2015
Wei Yi - Lazaro Bruzon
Danzhou, 3.07.2015
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. Nc3 a6 4. Be2 Nc6 5. d4 cxd4 6. Nxd4 Qc7 7. O-O Nf6 8. Be3 Be7 9. f4 d6 10. Kh1 O-O 11. Qe1 Nxd4 12. Bxd4 b5 13. Qg3 Bb7 14. a3 Rad8 15. Rae1 Rd7 16. Bd3 Qd8 17. Qh3 g6 18. f5 e5 19. Be3 Re8 20. fxg6 hxg6 21. Nd5 Nxd5 22. Rxf7 Kxf7 23. Qh7 Ke6 24. exd5 Kxd5 25. Be4 Kxe4 26. Qf7 Bf6 27. Bd2 Kd4 28. Be3 Ke4 29. Qb3 Kf5 30. Rf1 Kg4 31. Qd3 Bxg2 32. Kxg2 Qa8 33. Kg1 Bg5 34. Qe2 Kh4 35. Bf2 Kh3 36. Be1 1-0
Friday, 3 July 2015
2015 Oceania Zonal
The 2015 Oceania Zonal begins on Saturday at the North Sydney Leagues Club, and at the moment the Open Zonal has around 100 entries. This is the largest field for zonal since the Oceania Zone was formed, and while the majority of entries are from Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Papua New Guinea are also sending representatives.
The tournament is a qualifier for the upcoming FIDE World Cup, and the top of the field contains a number of players aiming for that event. Current Australian Champion Max Illingworth is the top seed, with Moulthun Ly and Anton Smirnov seeded just behind him.
The event also provides an opportunity for players to earn FIDE titles, with anyone score 50% or above eligible for a Candidate Master title, while 66% earns a FIDE Master title. FIDE have tightened up the regulations for the direct IM title from Zonal's with a player having to finish 1st to receive the title.
The tournament begins on the July 4 at the North Sydney Leagues Club at 1pm. There will be live coverage of the top boards, and spectators are most welcome. Results/pairings etc will be available from the tournament website.
(** I am a paid official for this event **)
The tournament is a qualifier for the upcoming FIDE World Cup, and the top of the field contains a number of players aiming for that event. Current Australian Champion Max Illingworth is the top seed, with Moulthun Ly and Anton Smirnov seeded just behind him.
The event also provides an opportunity for players to earn FIDE titles, with anyone score 50% or above eligible for a Candidate Master title, while 66% earns a FIDE Master title. FIDE have tightened up the regulations for the direct IM title from Zonal's with a player having to finish 1st to receive the title.
The tournament begins on the July 4 at the North Sydney Leagues Club at 1pm. There will be live coverage of the top boards, and spectators are most welcome. Results/pairings etc will be available from the tournament website.
(** I am a paid official for this event **)
Thursday, 2 July 2015
Don't speak to soon
As a rule I don't discuss games while they are in progress. Either my games or even games where I am not involved. This is mainly due to the fact I direct a lot of events, and I want to make sure everything is by the book.
Of course when I was younger (and before I became a serious arbiter), I often chatted about the state of my game, especially if I felt I was winning. Of course this sort of talk can lead to a quick downfall if you are not careful.
At my local chess club (ANU) this evening this almost happened. A player (who shall remain nameless) sidled up to me and said "I think have a mate in two, against any defence". I just said "uh, huh" and waited till the player returned to the board. Taking a quick glance I noticed two things. Firstly, his opponent had a fairly obvious defence, and secondly, this was almost a copy of a famous incident that occurred over 100 years ago.
In the 1911 Karlsbad tournament, Frank Marshal was up against Fedor Dus Chotimirsky. After a fairly even opening, Dus Chotimirsky spotted a chance to mate Marshall. With Queen, Knight and Bishop all converging in Marshall's King, he went even as far to explain to spectators that 'Poor Marshall dead. Must be mate'. Unfortunately there was a hole in his analysis, and after Marshall's obvious reply he exclaimed "Oh oh. Marshall not dead, I dead" before resigning.
However, unlike Dus Chotimirsky, the confident ANU player at least ad the satisfaction of winning his game, but it did take longer than he thought.
Marshall,Frank James - Dus Chotimirsky,Fedor Ivanovich [D21]
Karlsbad Karlsbad (25), 24.09.1911
Of course when I was younger (and before I became a serious arbiter), I often chatted about the state of my game, especially if I felt I was winning. Of course this sort of talk can lead to a quick downfall if you are not careful.
At my local chess club (ANU) this evening this almost happened. A player (who shall remain nameless) sidled up to me and said "I think have a mate in two, against any defence". I just said "uh, huh" and waited till the player returned to the board. Taking a quick glance I noticed two things. Firstly, his opponent had a fairly obvious defence, and secondly, this was almost a copy of a famous incident that occurred over 100 years ago.
In the 1911 Karlsbad tournament, Frank Marshal was up against Fedor Dus Chotimirsky. After a fairly even opening, Dus Chotimirsky spotted a chance to mate Marshall. With Queen, Knight and Bishop all converging in Marshall's King, he went even as far to explain to spectators that 'Poor Marshall dead. Must be mate'. Unfortunately there was a hole in his analysis, and after Marshall's obvious reply he exclaimed "Oh oh. Marshall not dead, I dead" before resigning.
However, unlike Dus Chotimirsky, the confident ANU player at least ad the satisfaction of winning his game, but it did take longer than he thought.
Marshall,Frank James - Dus Chotimirsky,Fedor Ivanovich [D21]
Karlsbad Karlsbad (25), 24.09.1911
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 dxc4 4. e3 a6 5. Ne5 Nd7 6. Nxd7 Bxd7 7. Bxc4 Bc6 8. O-O Bd6 9. Nc3 Qh4 10. f4 Nf6 11. Bd2 Ng4 12. h3 Qg3 13. Qxg4 1-0
Wednesday, 1 July 2015
Yoko Chess
There are very few things that I have as an absolute belief. One, Don Bradman is simply the greatest sportsmen, of any sport, in history. Two, The Beatles produced the best music of any recording artist, ever.
So anything related to the Beatles peaks my interest. When there is a chess crossover, then my interest is doubled. These two things came together with the news that Yoko Ono has released a chess app called 'Yoko Chess'. The basic 3D version if free (for the iPad/iPhone) but you can get a premium version as well. This contains both a board where all the chess pieces are dogs, while the second set is a version of her famous all white set from 1968, titled 'Play it by Trust'.
The all white set is about showing we are all on the same side, but those who can play "Kibitzer's Chess" can also use it to play that variant.
If you want a copy, click through the story here, and follow the links.
So anything related to the Beatles peaks my interest. When there is a chess crossover, then my interest is doubled. These two things came together with the news that Yoko Ono has released a chess app called 'Yoko Chess'. The basic 3D version if free (for the iPad/iPhone) but you can get a premium version as well. This contains both a board where all the chess pieces are dogs, while the second set is a version of her famous all white set from 1968, titled 'Play it by Trust'.
The all white set is about showing we are all on the same side, but those who can play "Kibitzer's Chess" can also use it to play that variant.
If you want a copy, click through the story here, and follow the links.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)